Interview with Paul Hellier (Part 2), July 4, 2024

The current interregnum; accountability for Covid crimes; shock & psychological torture; who runs society?; fraudulent science; Desmet; perception management; digital technologies of oppression; evil

Interview with Paul Hellier (Part 2), July 4, 2024
audio-thumbnail
Interview with Paul Hellier (Part 2), July 4, 2024
0:00
/200

This is the second half of my interview with Paul Hellier. It gets going around 03:50. Topics discussed include:

  • the interregnum period while the ruling class tries to dismantle liberal democracy and national sovereignty, marking the end of “political modernity” dating back to the American and French revolutions;
  • the need for accountability for the crimes of the Covid era;
  • shell shock produces psychologically malleable subjects. Different techniques of shock have been applied, first to individuals, and then to groups and entire societies;
  • techniques of trauma-based mind control, from MKULTRA to “Covid-19”;
  • the deliberate production of insanity and stress as part of the “Covid-19” operation, consistent with psychological torture;
  • who is in charge of society? Not prime ministers and presidents! The deep state intervenes in the ordinary running of affairs';
  • the fraudulent nature of vaccinology and the corruption of mainstream science;
  • the military agenda to initiate the war for technocracy, with “Covid-19” providing the smokescreen;
  • perception management and the three camps of awareness;
  • Desmet’s The Psychology of Totalitarianism (2022);
  • Waters’ hit piece on me and my co-authors, which we duly dismantled;
  • “Mass formation” as Freud’s concept, not Desmet’s, and the intellectually flimsy nature of Desmet’s “mass formation” thesis;
  • the hallmarks of Camp 2 and Camp 3, in particular the size of audience reached, the level of planning and coordination involved in “cognitive infiltration,” and the huge size of Camp 2 relative to Camp 3;
  • new forms of control enabled by 21st century digital technology and A.I.;
  • the biodigital profiling of children;
  • the need to take individual responsibility for doing whatever it is that we, as individuals, can do to help put down the global technocratic coup; every acquiescence is acquiescence to evil; every silence connotes consent;
  • a significant section of society is opposed to what is taking place, but many are too frightened to speak out;
  • the marketing of technologies that have the potential to be used for great evil in positive terms;
  • psychological barriers to seeing what is happening — beyond the psychological warfare, are there physiological mechanisms for affecting the brain?';
  • finding the moral courage to face down evil, the need for God, and the power of prayer;
  • revolution from above (the “Great Reset”) vs. revolution from below (social revolution);
  • “Covid-19” as the opening campaign in the war for technocracy.